Skip to content
JAG Action | JAG Foundation
Working for Judicial Renewal

Empowering Congress, States, and Citizens to protect American Values.

Judicial Action Group is a boots on the ground lobbying effort in Washington, D.C. – focused on restoring the judiciary to its rightful place – deciding the law based on the Constitution, not personal opinion.

Support Us

Take Action Now

An important role of the Judicial Action Group is to affirm great judicial nominees and to oppose nominees that may have been improperly vetted. Please read the following summaries of JAG’s positions on upcoming judicial nominees. Click on the links below to read more detail on each nominee discussed. This section will be updated regularly to facilitate grassroot involvement in the confirmation process.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

URGENT – Due to concerning donations and political affiliations, JAG is advocating against the confirmation of Rebecca L. Taibleson. Call your Senators at (202) 224-3121, tell them to vote against the confirmation of Rebecca Taibleson, and ask them to ask the Trump administration to withdraw her from nomination.

 

In addition, two excellent Trump judicial nominees are being obstructed by the left. Please call both of your U.S. Senators now at (202) 224-3121 and tell them to vote to confirm both Joshua Dunlap and Chad Meredith, and to demand votes as soon as possible.

 

Vote Against - Rebecca Taibleson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Confirm - Joshua Dunlap, U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Confirm - Chad Meredith, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

Our Story

Restoring Justice, Protecting Values

Judicial Action Group is fighting every day for Judicial Renewal. Which is when judges return to their proper and noble role of simply deciding cases according to the laws of the land.

We wholeheartedly believe the day will come when the Judicial Branch is restored to its rightful Constitutional place. We long for the day when Congress, the states, and people make laws that favor life, marriage, decency, privacy, private property, religious freedom, and other vital American values.

What We Do

We work for Judicial Renewal 

Judicial Activism is when judges take sides in the cultural war, deciding cases based on public opinion instead of what is written in the Constitution. When judges re-appropriate legislative authority from Congress and make laws instead of interpreting laws and deciding cases.
​
Judicial Renewal is when judges return to their proper and noble role of simply deciding cases according to the laws of the land.

“

A judge declares independence not only from Congress and the President, but also from the private beliefs that might otherwise move her. The Judicial Oath captures the essence of the judicial duty the rule of law must always control."

-Justice Amy Coney Barrett

Judicial Pathways are

Influence

Research and lobbying for and against Judicial Appointments

Prayer

Intercessory Prayer for “Judicial Renewal”

Research

Developing and lobbying judicial accountability pieces of legislation in Congress

Support The Movement

Your giving is making a difference.​
Give Online

Give By Mail:

Judicial Action Group 1300 I Street NW #400E Washington, DC 2000

Current Issues

3 Ways to Pray for the Supreme Court This Month

July 24, 2025

Every month, the U.S. Supreme Court takes on decisions that have far-reaching effects—on our...

Take Action

How to Pray During a Supreme Court Case

July 24, 2025

How to Pray During a Supreme Court Case Timely guidance for intercessors during high-impact rulings...

Take Action

What is the National Consecration of the Court (NCC)?

July 24, 2025

Every year, something extraordinary happens on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court—not a protest,...

Take Action

Judicial Senate Scorecard

On Judicial Nomination Votes

In keeping with the Judicial Action Group’s mission to educate and inform, we have established a scoring system to reflect how each senator votes on every judicial nominee.
​
The Judicial Action Group will update this page to prepare for Senate votes on President Trump’s judicial nominees. Until then, please see below the scorecard for both the 117th and 118th Congress.
​
Nearly all of Biden’s judicial nominees are radical leftists and, therefore, constitutionalist senators should vote against them. On this scorecard, a perfect score of 100 reflects a senator’s vote against every one of Biden’s judicial nominees. Accordingly, a score of 0 indicates that a senator voted for every one of his judicial nominees.  A more detailed description of the scoring methodology can be found below.

Weighted Scorecard

*Scores for 118th Congress up to date as of 12/31/2024

1

Each Court
Weighted Different

Each vote taken by senators is weighted based on the federal court for which each potential judge is nominated. This is done to ensure that senators' scores reflect their position on the most important votes.

​District Court = multiplier of 1
Circuit Court = multiplier of 5
Supreme Court = multiplier of 20
2

Score
Calculation

Scores are calculated by dividing the weighted number of "No" votes cast by the senator by the total weighted votes possible for each senator.

(Total Weighted "No" Votes/Total Weighted Votes Possible)

Finally, the resulting number is multiplied by 100. Absent votes are not calculated and do not affect a senator's scores.
3

Example of
Methodology

If Senator A votes against three nominations (two of them district court nominees and one of them circuit court nominee), the total weighted score is calculated as follows:

District Court Nominee A- 1 Point
District Court Nominee B - 1 Point
Circuit Court Nominee C - 5 Points
Total Weighted "No" Votes - 7 Points
Total Weighted Votes Possible - 7 Points

7/7 = 1
1* 100 = 100 Points for the Senator

117th and 118th Senate Judicial Votes Data

The spreadsheet linked below includes all of the votes factored into the above scores, the calculations used to determine the final scores for each senator, and all the data for the 117th and 118th Congress (separated into two separate tabs). The data includes the names of each judicial nominee considered by the Senate as well the location of each court for which the judge was nominated. Please review each individual vote for yourself.

Click To Download

Contact Us

Contact Us